All posts by Looperreallyreallysucks

Having rewatched the trilogy pretty recently, I’m inclined to vote “cut” on Mary Jane and Gwen. I need someone to inform me why the latter was even added to begin with.

As for Spider-Man himself, I’m leaning towards “undecided”. Throughout much of the trilogy, he had some clear-cut corrupting qualities. But the fact that, like Misry said, he ended up eliminating all negative traits is what makes me hesitant about removing him.

Consensus: Not Pure Good

FYI, she actually *can* be both. If a character starts out as a hero but falls to the dark side and sheds all positive traits, they can become Pure Evil.

Just like with your proposal on the Villains Wiki, you're including absolutely no details at all. Stop abusing the discussions.

"Cut".

Keep - 0

Cut - 4

Undecided - 0

I'll give a cautious "yes."

All right,

Geez, it's almost been a month since this removal proposal was made. The admins really need to lock these proposals.

First of all, come on. Is anyone going to bother to lock this post? And second of all, ever heard of Pure Good proposals? Basically, I'm proposing Eleven to be removed only from the Pure Good category, not from the entire wiki.

Cut 'em all.

Cut them all.

Keep - 0

Cut - 5

Undecided - 0

Okay, seeing how this removal proposal has five unanimous "cut" votes, the consensus is "NOT Pure Good."

Keep-0

Cut-2

Undecided-0

It looks like it should.

@Zii Same here.

@Misry Yeah, it looks like this proposal has been around for a week. Time to cut the candidates. And also, the issue is, I don't even know how to give the category a stricter standard, which is why I'm not really on board with its inclusion.

I might sound a bit sarcastic, but I feel like Pure Good category is just to "fluttery" and "sunshine"-ish. A lot of people can easily just slap the Pure Good category onto any heroes they like, whether they have corrupting qualities or not. And even with the proposal rule in place, it's already too late, and there are tons of heroes who are listed as PG despite the fact that they clearly don't belong. Pure Evil, on the other hand, ultimately still has a stricter standard. And like I said, it sounds more dramatic and fitting overall.

Now, I'm not trying to bad-mouth this category or anything. I'm just offering my personal opinion. I hope this doesn't get taken the wrong way.

Cut all of them. If I have to be honest, I'll have to say that the Pure Good category isn't even very necessary to begin with. The idea of the category is confusing, and with Villains Wiki being my native website, I'll say that the Pure Evil category is much more precise and dramatic. Pure Good is way too much like a copy of the PE category, except the word "heinous" is replaced with "admirable."

I'll give a "yes."